Attorney Jim Desmond Archives

Determining Fault in a Multi-Car Collision

When you have a car wreck involving multiple vehicles, the legal concept of negligence is still the key to proving which driver was at fault and recovering your damages. It’s why we focus on determining fault in a multi-car collision. What do I mean by this?

attorney jim desmond discusses determining fault in a multi-car collision

Assume you have a collision involving four vehicles at an intersection. The car closest to the intersection is the number one vehicle and the car farthest away from the intersection is the number 4 vehicle. If car 1,2, and 3 are completely stopped at the intersection, they can’t be at fault for the car wreck. After all, they are obeying the law and are lawfully waiting for a traffic light to change. They have not done anything negligent or wrong to cause the wreck.

However, if car 4 approaches the intersection and fails to stop his vehicle thereby hitting the rear end of car 3, he is clearly at fault for causing the wreck between Car 4 and Car 3. The fact that car 3 may have contacted car 2 which was pushed into car 1, has no bearing on fault. The drivers of cars 1,2, and 3 have a claim against car 4 for his negligent driving.

If car 4 is uninsured, it does not change the issue of fault. Fault rests with the driver that had a legal duty to keep his vehicle under proper control, failed in that duty and that failure caused your damages. This is one example of determining fault in a multi-car collision.

Speak to an Experienced Car Wreck Attorney

I’m attorney Jim Desmond. If you would like to speak with an experienced car wreck attorney, call me on my cell phone. My number is (502) 609-7657. I’ll be happy to listen to you about your specific situation.

If you’d like to listen to my podcast episode “Determining Fault in a Kentucky Car Accident, click below:

Medical Freedom for Victims: Your Right to Choose Your Doctor

To be clear, no-fault insurance, or med-pay coverage, does not require you to go a specific doctor or get pre-authorization. Rather, the Kentucky Motor Vehicle Reparations Act says that if the treatment is reasonable and related to the injuries sustained in the car wreck, the PIP carrier, a.k.a. the no-fault insurance company, owes coverage for that medical bill. You can treat with whichever doctor you want.

Don’t Let People Play Games with You

When it comes to personal injury protection coverage (“PIP), there are not any pre-authorizations or medical providers in or out of a network. Rather, a no-fault carrier has you sign a PIP application which is essentially, a fancy medical authorization. This authorization allows them to obtain your medical records and bills, to review them and to determine if they are related to the injuries sustained in the car wreck. Why is this important? Because you can go wherever you want, to whichever doctor or chiropractor you choose, to treat for your injuries.

I just spoke to a new client. In short, one of the big firms told him that he was going to be referred to a chiropractor, even after he said he was not comfortable with a chiropractor. Look, I have nothing against chiropractors but who he decides to obtain medical treatment from is the client’s choice, not the choice of any personal injury lawyer.

It’s All About You

My job as a personal injury lawyer is to advise my client of what I believe the best decision would be. It’s not to make that decision for him/her. I give out the name of chiropractors and/or medical doctors during the course of handling the client’s injury claim. However, I do so because either those doctors are easy to work or because they will work with me on reducing their charges, if necessary, to maximize a client’s recovery. Nevertheless, I make it clear to all my clients, and I have said this in front of doctors:

“You are my client, not this medical provider! While I appreciate that this medical provider may have given you my name, my legal duties run to you. If you are not happy with their facility or if the treatment is not helping you, let me know. We will find you another doctor, or chiropractor, and I will still be your lawyer.”

I consider some of the doctors or chiropractors that I have worked with to be good friends and I have even traveled with them. Nevertheless, my client has the absolute right to choose where he or she wants to receive medical treatment. My job, as a good personal injury lawyer, is to make sure those charges will be paid and/or reduced out of any personal injury settlement that might be reached.

Click here to listed to my podcast episode about PIP (“no-fault”) insurance coverage.

Need More Information?

If you have questions about your automobile accident, call my cell at (502) 609-7657. As an attorney, I handle motor vehicle accident claims in Kentucky and Indiana. You deserve to speak directly with an attorney; not a paralegal or case manager. My principal office is located in Louisville, Kentucky.

This is an adverstisement.

Accountability Matters: Holding At-Fault Drivers Responsible

If you’ve been injured in an automobile collision, your medical bills will add up quickly. This is especially true if you are still treating. If those medical expenses exceed the other person’s insurance limits, are we letting the at-fault driver off the hook if we settle for their policy limits? We are not.

The Kentucky state minimum in insurance is $25,000 per person. This means as long as someone has $25,000 in insurance coverage per person, they are driving lawfully. What it does not mean is that they have enough insurance to cover your medical bills or your claim for pain and suffering. So, can I sue the at-fault driver and refuse to accept the settlement of $25,000, their policy limits? The answer is “Yes” but, I don’t recommend it. Read further to understand why.

If you sue someone, you are trying to get a judgment against them and then collect on that judgment. Well, if a person does not have any assets such as real estate and bank accounts, how are you going to collect on that judgment? The clear answer is you won’t. As the old saying goes, you can’t get blood from a turnip.

So, instead of trying to sue someone beyond their insurance coverage, the better route is to put your insurance company on notice of an underinsured motorist claim. In a recent case I am handling, I found $50,000 of underinsured motorist coverage that applies to the claim.

After I comply with a legal procedure known as Coots, see KRS 304.39-320, and your insurance carrier consents to you accepting the $25,000 offered by the at-fault driver, your insurance carrier acts like they insure the at-fault driver for another $50,000, in the case I am presently handling.

By filing the underinsured motorist claim, we have the ability to recover more dollars, beyond the $25,000, on your behalf. Your insurance carrier, not you, will bear the burden and expense of suing the at-fault driver to recover any funds they pay out to you.

No one plans to get into a car wreck. The results often complicate our lives in ways we never imagined. While settling for the at-fault driver’s policy limits, even when your medical bills exceed that amount, it doesn’t mean we are letting the at-fault driver off the hook. As an experienced automobile accident attorney, I highly recommend you review your auto insurance policy to make sure you and your family members have enough uninsured and under insured (UM/UIM) coverage. It’s a step you can take to make sure you’re protected when the unexpected happens.

If you’d like to listen to my podcast episode explaining Uninsured and Under Insured Motorist Coverage, click below:

Principal office located in Louisville, KY.

This is an advertisement.

Tag: Attorney Jim Desmond

Speak to an Experienced Car Wreck Attorney